The Newton–Leibniz Formula
BasisBefore the Newton–Leibniz formula was understood, computing a definite integral meant forming Riemann sums, taking a limit, and somehow identifying what that limit equalled — a process that had to be carried out from scratch for every new integrand. The formula, also called the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, cuts through all of that: it says that integration and differentiation are inverse operations, so to evaluate you only need to find a function whose derivative is , then subtract its values at the endpoints. This single observation transforms pages of limit arguments into a one-line computation.
The theorem has two logically distinct halves. The first half shows that the integral with a variable upper limit is itself differentiable; the second half shows how any primitive (antiderivative) can be used to evaluate the integral. Together they form the deepest result in elementary calculus.
Part 1: the integral with a variable upper limit is a primitive
Let be continuous on . Because is continuous it is Riemann integrable on every subinterval, so the expression
is well defined. We call the integral with variable upper limit, and the claim is that is differentiable with at every point of .
Proof of Part 1
Fix and let be small enough so that . By the additivity of the integral,
Dividing by gives the difference quotient
Because is continuous on the interval between and , the mean value theorem for integrals guarantees the existence of a point between and such that
Substituting back,
As the point is squeezed between and , so . By continuity of ,
Therefore the difference quotient converges to , which is exactly the definition of differentiability:
The same argument applies at the endpoints and using one-sided limits. Part 1 tells you that every continuous function has a primitive, and it exhibits one explicitly: the integral with variable upper limit.
Part 2: evaluating a definite integral via any primitive
Part 2 of the Newton–Leibniz formula says that if is any primitive of on — that is, for all — then
Proof of Part 2
We already know from Part 1 that is a primitive of . Since is also a primitive of , the difference satisfies
for all . By the theorem that primitives differ by a constant (which follows from Lagrange’s mean value theorem), a function with zero derivative on an interval is constant. So there exists with
Evaluate at both endpoints. At :
At :
Subtracting the first equation from the second:
The bracket notation
It is standard to write
This notation is compact and reduces the risk of sign errors. With it, the Newton–Leibniz formula reads
where is any primitive of . You may add an arbitrary constant to without affecting the result, since the constant cancels in ; this is why the choice of primitive does not matter.
Worked examples
Example 1:
A primitive of is . Applying Newton–Leibniz:
Example 2:
A primitive of is . Therefore
Geometrically, the result is the area of one arch of the sine curve above the -axis, which is a satisfying sanity check.
Example 3:
A primitive of on is . Therefore
This confirms the geometric meaning of : it is precisely the number for which the area under from to equals .
Summary
- Part 1 (FTC1): If is continuous on , then is differentiable and . In particular, every continuous function has a primitive.
- Part 2 (FTC2): If is any primitive of on , then .
- The proof of Part 1 uses the mean value theorem for integrals to identify the limit of the difference quotient with .
- The proof of Part 2 uses the fact that two primitives of the same function differ by a constant (from the primitives checkpoint), then evaluates that constant by plugging in .
- The bracket notation is a compact shorthand for the evaluation step.
- The formula completely decouples the two problems that initially seemed inseparable: computing areas (definite integrals) and finding antiderivatives (primitives). To integrate, you only need to differentiate backwards.