Mean Value Theorem for Integrals
BasisPrerequisites
If you drive for two hours and cover 120 km, your average speed was 60 km/h. At some instant you were travelling at exactly that average. The integral version of this fact says: the average value of a continuous function is actually attained at some point in the interval. This is the Mean Value Theorem for integrals, and it is the key ingredient in proving that the variable-upper-limit function is differentiable.
Statement
Theorem (Mean Value Theorem for Integrals). Let be continuous. Then there exists such that
Equivalently, the average value of on , defined as , is attained by at some interior point.
Proof
Since is continuous on the closed bounded interval , it attains its minimum and its maximum (by the Extreme Value Theorem). By monotonicity of the integral, comparing with the constant functions and gives
Dividing by :
The quantity lies between the minimum and maximum values of on . Since is continuous on , the Intermediate Value Theorem guarantees the existence of with . Multiplying both sides by gives the result.
The weighted version
A more general form replaces the length with a non-negative weight function.
Theorem (Weighted Mean Value Theorem for Integrals). Let be continuous and let be integrable with for all . Then there exists such that
Proof. Again let and . Since and , monotonicity gives
Case 1: . Then the left integral is also (since ), so the equation holds for any . Take .
Case 2: . Divide the inequality by to get
By the IVT (same argument as before) there exists with equal to that ratio.
The unweighted theorem is the special case .
Geometric interpretation: average value
Define the average value of on to be
Geometrically, is the height of the rectangle with base whose area equals . The Mean Value Theorem says this rectangle has the same area as the region under the curve: the curve’s height at equals the rectangle’s height. Put differently, a continuous function must pass through its own average.
This interpretation is useful for estimation: if you know is bounded between and on , then
bounding the integral without computing it exactly.
Worked example
Problem. Show that .
Solution. The function is continuous and strictly decreasing on , with and . By monotonicity of the integral,
so the integral lies in . Since is strictly decreasing and not constant, the inequalities are strict:
The Mean Value Theorem guarantees that for some — there is a specific -value whose function value equals the average, even though we cannot find it in closed form.
Numerical check. The integral is approximately , which indeed lies in .
Summary
- Mean Value Theorem for integrals: if is continuous on , then for some .
- Proof: the bounds from monotonicity, combined with the IVT for continuous functions, guarantee that the average value is attained.
- Weighted version: if is integrable, then for some .
- Average value: is the height of the equal-area rectangle; the theorem says at some .
- The theorem is used directly in the proof of the Newton–Leibniz formula to bound the difference quotient of the variable-upper-limit function.